Euthanasia Essay - Civil Remedies and Assisted Suicide :: Free Euthanasia Essay

Civil Remedies and help Suicide This essay goes into the need for civil remedies to book against adverted suicide actions by family, guardians, etc. Some states stand already enacted such legislation, and others are in the process. This is a simple, safe legal procedure for protect against the threat ot assisted suicide/euthanasia. On May 2, 1994, a Michigan jury acquitted maw Kevorkian of charges related to his publicly proclaimed assistance in the suicide of Thomas Hyde. The verdict points up the way in which the pathos of individual cases often leads sinful case juries to react emotionally, failing to give unselfish attention to the general effects on older people and people with disabilities of signaling societal acceptation of death as the solution to human problems. This is a weakness in our society at the present time. This is one of several strong reasons why more(prenominal) states should follow the lead of Minnesota, Tennessee, and North Dakota, all of which ha ve recently enacted civil remedy statutes that, entirely apart from criminal remedies, allow private parties to obtain injunctions against those who assist suicides. Injunctions are granted by assesss, without juries, and a judge can punish violators with sanctions for contempt of court. Regrettably, the Kevorkian acquittal is not an isolated case of jury nullification of laws protect suicide victims. Recent history demonstrates that no physicians, and fewer non-physicians, have been successfully prosecuted for assisting suicide. The emotional tug of individual cases makes prosecutors reluctant to seek punishment and juries reluctant to chat it. An article in the November 5, 1992 issue of the New England ledger of Medicine co-authored by Dr. Timothy Qu sick of(p) (who himself escaped penalty when a grand jury refused to charge him for his openly announced participation in assisting a suicide1) notes, In every situation in which a physician has compassionately helped a termina lly ill person to commit suicide, criminal charges have been pink-slipped or a verdict of not guilty has been brought.2 Other studies confirm this conclusion, which in fact is not limited to circumstances of terminal illness or compassion.3 While there have been a few successful criminal prosecutions of non-doctors, they have been extremely rare. A 1986 article in the Columbia Law come off concluded All indications are that assistance statutes are rarely, if ever, used. ... Despite the thousands of suicides each year, only about fifty news reports regarding some(a) form of prosecution in the past disco biscuit for some type of assistance to suicide have been located.Euthanasia Essay - Civil Remedies and Assisted Suicide Free Euthanasia EssayCivil Remedies and Assisted Suicide This essay goes into the need for civil remedies to guard against assisted suicide actions by family, guardians, etc. Some states have already enacted such legislation, and others are in the process. This is a simple, safe legal procedure for protecting against the threat ot assisted suicide/euthanasia. On May 2, 1994, a Michigan jury acquitted Jack Kevorkian of charges related to his publicly proclaimed assistance in the suicide of Thomas Hyde. The verdict points up the way in which the pathos of individual cases often leads criminal case juries to react emotionally, failing to give considerate attention to the general effects on older people and people with disabilities of signaling societal acceptance of death as the solution to human problems. This is a weakness in our society at the present time. This is one of several strong reasons why more states should follow the lead of Minnesota, Tennessee, and North Dakota, all of which have recently enacted civil remedy statutes that, entirely apart from criminal remedies, allow private parties to obtain injunctions against those who assist suicides. Injunctions are granted by judges, without juries, and a judge can punish violato rs with sanctions for contempt of court. Regrettably, the Kevorkian acquittal is not an isolated case of jury nullification of laws protecting suicide victims. Recent history demonstrates that no physicians, and few non-physicians, have been successfully prosecuted for assisting suicide. The emotional tug of individual cases makes prosecutors reluctant to seek punishment and juries reluctant to impose it. An article in the November 5, 1992 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine co-authored by Dr. Timothy Quill (who himself escaped penalty when a grand jury refused to indict him for his openly announced participation in assisting a suicide1) notes, In every situation in which a physician has compassionately helped a terminally ill person to commit suicide, criminal charges have been dismissed or a verdict of not guilty has been brought.2 Other studies confirm this conclusion, which in fact is not limited to circumstances of terminal illness or compassion.3 While there have been a few successful criminal prosecutions of non-doctors, they have been extremely rare. A 1986 article in the Columbia Law Review concluded All indications are that assistance statutes are rarely, if ever, used. ... Despite the thousands of suicides each year, only about fifty news reports regarding some form of prosecution in the past decade for some type of assistance to suicide have been located.